Sunday, July 3, 2011
Enjoying My Independence Weekend
I went to train today with some of my associates. As I was shooting weapons that people in Massachusetts, California, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and some other states would not be allowed to possess, a realization came upon me. Different parts of our nation are more 'independent' than others. How can this be you ask? Here is my take on the situation. The federal government only gets involved when it fits the narrative of the people in charge at the time. Here is an example. When the assault weapons ban was enacted by Bill 'the shill' Clinton, it was a federal law that all states had to comply with. It did absolutely nothing to lower crime, but it made the gun grabbers ecstatic. When the bill expired, you would think that all states would go back to the way that it was before the ban wouldn't you? The answer to that is no, because after all, there are states rights....unless of course when you want to have your own immigration laws, and then the feds will step in to stop you. You see, the feds only step in when it fits the narrative. Since the current group in Washington like the gun grabbers and restricting second amendment rights, there is no way in hell that they are going to tell the gun anal states such as New York and California, that their citizens need to have their rights restored to what they were before the assault weapons ban because gun control s a vital part of the narrative. After the cluster that is the gunwalker scandal, you would think that the powers to be would be abhorred that the ATF was allowing guns to walk into the hands of violent narco terrorists, and that there would be a major outcry by politicians as well as the media, but instead the solution is to talk about more gun control, and giving the ATF yet more power. Why you ask? Because it doesn't fit the narrative of the agenda, which is gun control.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment